Tuesday, November 9, 2010
CAAC Member Announcement: Autism Event for Greater Bristol Farmington Valley Community Collaborative
|
Friday, November 5, 2010
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Weekly Advocacy Monitor: Volume 8, Issue 33; November 1, 2010
National Council on Independent Living
Weekly Advocacy Monitor
Volume 8, Issue 33; November 1, 2010
1) What's Happening in the Nation's Capital?
-White House Urges More Hiring of People with Disabilities; Initiative Attempts to Strengthen Clinton-Era Order
2) National News
-Unfriendly Skies? Blind Passengers Sue United
-More Young People with Intellectual Disabilities Go to College
3) State News
-Connecticut Governor's Race Spotlights Disabilities
-Want to Speak Up About Movie Theater Captions? Hearings to be Held in Chicago, San Francisco, and D.C.
-Mississippi Hotline for Voting Rights
4) Announcements and Additional Resources
-Survey on Public Transit
-FCC to Hold Open Developer Day on November 8, 2010
-Creating Art to Say No to Violence
1) What's Happening in the Nation's Capital?
White House Urges More Hiring of People with Disabilities; Initiative Attempts to Strengthen Clinton-Era Order
Source: federaltimes.com
With agencies facing a renewed White House push to hire nearly twice as many employees with disabilities, the Office of Personnel Management is ramping up a campaign to show them how to do that. A training event last week drew about 285 hiring managers and human resources professionals to OPM's auditorium; the agency hopes to host similar events elsewhere in the county where there are large numbers of federal employees, Deputy Director Christine Griffin said. "This was really the kickoff," she said. "This is going to be evaluated: what worked; what didn't."
A July executive order issued by President Obama sets a target of adding 100,000 people with disabilities to the federal work force over five years. About 105,000 disabled people are in the work force now.
The order requires OPM — in conjunction with the Labor Department, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Office of Management and Budget — to come up with model recruitment and hiring strategies. Under the executive order, those plans were supposed to be completed last month, but were held up in the clearance process at OPM and other agencies, Griffin said. They could be out as early as this week.
With the guidance in hand, agencies will have 120 days to come up with their own plans and numerical goals for hiring more disabled people. Each agency will also have to name a senior-level official responsible for meeting those goals. Read More ( http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20101027/PERSONNEL02/10270301/1049/PERSONNEL ).
2) National News
Unfriendly Skies? Blind Passengers Sue United
Source: NPR / WQED
This week, a group of blind air travelers filed suit against United Airlines claiming that the airline's digital kiosks are inaccessible to blind people. It's not a problem that most travelers think about: How would they get through an airport without their eyesight? But something as simple as finding out your flight's gate can be a hassle.
Mike May, who lives in Davis, Calif., says he has to ask someone to look for flight information on the big digital boards. And checking in using the now-ubiquitous electronic kiosks is an even bigger hassle, at least at many airlines. "There's no earphone jack, no audio output, no Braille output," says May, who is one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. So he often has to find a stranger with time to help, then hand over his credit card and other private information. "It's demeaning to have to ask, it's inconvenient, and it has an element of not being safe to have to depend on another person for that," he says.
Websites Inaccessible, Too: In fact, the problems start even before they get to the airport, says Jonathan Lazar, who teaches computer science at Towson University in Maryland. Recently, Lazar took a close look at the websites of 10 leading airlines. He found that four of them, including United, are inaccessible to blind people; the sites are incompatible with the screen readers that blind people use to surf the Web.
Those airlines effectively force blind people to buy tickets by phone, "and more than one-third of the time, they ended up overcharging blind people. Either charging higher fares, or refusing to waive the call center fee, or both," Lazar says. Read More ( http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130921227 ).
More Young People with Intellectual Disabilities Go to College
Source: Fox News
In years past, college life was largely off-limits for students with such disabilities, but that's no longer the case. Students with Down syndrome, autism and other conditions that can result in intellectual disabilities are leaving high school more academically prepared than ever and ready for the next step: college.
Eight years ago, disability advocates were able to find only four programs on university campuses that allowed students with intellectual disabilities to experience college life with extra help from mentors and tutors.
As of last year, there were more than 250 spread across more than three dozen states and two Canadian provinces, said Debra Hart, head of Think College at the Institute for Community Inclusion at the University of Massachusetts Boston, which provides services to people with disabilities.
That growth is partly because of an increasing demand for higher education for these students and there are new federal funds for such programs.
The federal rules that took effect this fall allow students with intellectual disabilities to receive grants and work-study money. Because details on the rules are still being worked out, the earliest students could have the money is next year. Hart and others expect the funds to prompt the creation of even more programs.
"There is a whole generation of young people who have grown up under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and to them it (college) is the logical next step," Hart said. Read More ( http://www.foxnews.com/health/2010/10/18/intellectually-disabled-youths-college/ ).
3) State News
Connecticut Governor's Race Spotlights Disabilities
Source: Norwich Bulletin, By Sharma Howard
A statue that depicts one of America's most charismatic presidents, Franklin D. Roosevelt, was sculpted to show him in a way he wanted to be seen — able-bodied. But the man who led the United States out of the Great Depression and through World War II was [had post polio syndrome]. In today's world, a politician with a disability can be perceived positively by constituents, disability advocate Elanah Sherman, of Norwich, said.
This dynamic is unfolding in Connecticut, where Democratic gubernatorial candidate Dan Malloy, who has dyslexia, and Republican candidate Tom Foley, who has Bell's palsy, are in a tight race. "Now, it's more an emblem of pride than an emblem of stigma," Sherman said.
Some might say this points to dramatic change, but, rather, it is a softening of a harsh landscape for the disabled that has come with time and hard work.
"We are fighting societal attitudes with teaspoons — you're still a person first, and then you have a disability," said Catherine Ferry, executive director of the Norwich-based Disabilities Network of Eastern Connecticut. "The nature of stigma is still there. People don't say things directly, but they will think in stereotypes."
Advocates such as Ferry are hoping Tuesday's election will continue to help de-stigmatize [people with disabilities]. If either Foley or Malloy is elected, it will be the first time Connecticut will have a governor who has acknowledged a disability or condition that sets them apart. Independent Thomas E. Marsh also is on the gubernatorial ballot.
Malloy, the former mayor of Stamford, graduated with a law degree from Boston College. When he was a child, his parents were told not to expect much from him, he said, and even labeled him mentally retarded. Today, Malloy often talks to parents and children about his disability.
His presence as governor could challenge perception. So could the election of Foley, a successful businessman who describes his Bell's palsy, a drooping or paralysis on one side of the face, as an "affliction." Read More ( http://www.norwichbulletin.com/carousel/x1650567861/Governor-s-race-spotlights-disabilities ).
Want to Speak Up About Movie Theater Captions? Hearings to be Held in Chicago, San Francisco, and D.C.
Source: Deafness Blog ( http://deafness.about.com/b/2010/10/28/want-to-speak-up-about-movie-theater-captions.htm ), By Jamie Berke, Deafness Guide
Now you can! If you live in or near Chicago, San Francisco, or Washington, DC you can speak up about movie theater captioning (and other topics including web site accessibility) at three hearings on Department of Justice Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemakings (ANPRs). These ANPRs address nondiscrimination in both state and local government services, and public accommodations and commercial facilities.
You do have to register in advance. If you are one of those who prefers open captions to the closed rear window captions in theaters, now is your chance. Speakers get only five minutes to talk, but the DOJ is also welcoming written testimony. Full details are on the DOJ website ( http://www.ada.gov/anprm2010/public_hearing_anprm_2010.htm ). Hat tip to the [National Association for the Deaf].
Mississippi Hotline for Voting Rights
Source: wapt.com
Disability Rights Mississippi, a private, non-profit, legal protection and advocacy agency for the state of Mississippi will have advocates and attorneys manning a hotline during Tuesday's general election.
The purpose of the hotline is to provide information to individuals with disabilities who have concerns regarding their right to access to the ballot. It will also provide assistance and guidance to poll-workers should they have a question or concern about the voting process. The hotline, which is 1-800-772-4057 will be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Tuesday. For more information, go to www.drms.ms.
4) Announcements and Additional Resources
Survey on Public Transit
The Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Accessible Public Transportation, a partnership between the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University and the IDeA Center at SUNY Buffalo, is currently recruiting individuals of all ages (18 and older) and abilities to participate in an online survey that investigates user requirements for public transit buses. The survey includes questions on individuals' experiences getting on and off public buses, circulating inside of buses, understanding the communication and information systems of public buses, as well as issues concerning rider safety. The information collected from this study should help identify the aspects of using public buses that merit further detailed experimental research in controlled settings.
Access the brief survey at: http://www.udeworld.com/surveys/transitbusstudy.html.
FCC to Hold Open Developer Day on November 8, 2010
Source: FCC
On Monday, November 8, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission will sponsor an "Open Developer Day" event at FCC Headquarters in Washington, DC, (445 12th St., SW) to promote collaboration between web developers in the public and private sectors in furtherance of FCC goals to foster citizen participation in open government and further innovation in accessible technologies.
This will be a public, single-day event that prioritizes accessibility goals, though other web solutions are also of interest. The event will feature guest engineers from the Yahoo! Developer Network and Yahoo!'s Accessibility team and will have a component addressing the requirements and opportunities in the new "Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act."
FCC's Chief Data Officer Greg Elin described Open Developer Day as a digital barnraising where software developers learn new tools and volunteer their skills to prototype and build new web applications together. "Developer days have become a tradition in the web community for programmers to share knowledge, learn tools, and build things. We are excited to bring this tradition to the FCC," Elin said. Read More ( http://www.fcc.gov/cib/dro/headlines.html ).
Creating Art to Say No to Violence
Over the last six weeks, 14 different youth have committed suicide because they were bullied for being gay. The National Youth Leadership Network, an organization led by young people with disabilities, recently put out a statement on ending violence for all youth ( http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=55qnz6cab&v=001g7xYn3eIW2Nu6yYesfNvtOVQR8o1aysQxsmoFXbUNQF5VKerL1gP7-BmkeC0ey9L17mFXw6O9ncbTf87Y_M_gZgsXv19V9cvT4W3EF78jKfr3bPVp8GaGZ3_3Mxz6MmMiKpVuMBqH8GkhnZpmledIwf5NgalUm7qGBUGV4o7YvZZzqTyvBwMrw%3D%3D ) -- youth with disabilities, immigrant youth, GLBTQ youth, and the multitudes of people who are bullied. After we put out this statement, Becky Atkinson, a youth advocate from NC, asked if she could send the 14 families cards expressing her condolences. We did not have their addresses, but want to follow in Becky's steps and make cards.
We will being collecting cards and other sentiments (poems, letters, drawings, videos, statements, music mixes, readings etc) from the disability community. This is a time the disability community can come together to cry out against violence. After everything is compiled and made public, we will contact local media in the towns of these young people and talk about the ways people experience violence when they are pushed outside of the box of what is considered normal. We want people to know why it is important to create safe spaces for everyone, including youth with disabilities and GLBTQ youth.
The deadline for submissions is NOV 12, 2010 but please email me this week at stacey@nyln.org if you can join us in this. We appreciate it if you can forward this to others who may be interested in participating in the card-making and/or the media interviews. All classrooms, organizations, groups, and individuals who participate will be credited. We are asking that cards go deeper than the "it gets better if you wait it out" message, and talks about personal experiences, resiliency, community, power, and ending violence.
Contact the Editor: Eleanor@ncil.org. To advertise in the Weekly Advocacy Monitor, contact the Editor.
DNEC's interview with the Norwich Bulletin article is in NCIL national weekly!
From: NCIL <ncil@ncil.org>
Subject: Weekly Advocacy Monitor: Volume 8, Issue 33; November 1, 2010
To: "NCIL" <ncil@ncil.org>
Date: Monday, November 1, 2010, 5:07 PM
National Council on Independent Living
Volume 8, Issue 33 November 1, 2010
In This Issue:
1) What's Happening in the Nation's Capital?
White House Urges More Hiring of People with Disabilities; Initiative Attempts to Strengthen Clinton-Era Order
2) National News
Unfriendly Skies? Blind Passengers Sue United
More Young People with Intellectual Disabilities Go to College
3) State News
Connecticut Governor's Race Spotlights Disabilities
Want to Speak Up About Movie Theater Captions? Hearings to be Held in Chicago , San Francisco , and D.C.
Mississippi Hotline for Voting Rights
4) Announcements and Additional Resources
Survey on Public Transit
FCC to Hold Open Developer Day on November 8, 2010
Creating Art to Say No to Violence
If the link above is not active, please visit http://www.ncil.org/resources/whamv8i33.html to access this week's WhAM! The text-only version is attached to this email.
Contact the Editor: Eleanor@ncil.org
To advertise in the Weekly Advocacy Monitor, contact the Editor.
Initiative to hire People with Disabilities
White House Urges More Hiring of People with Disabilities; Initiative Attempts to Strengthen Clinton-Era Order
|
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Help us to help others!!! Chili's Fundraiser
From: Joan Wessell JCWessell@seniorresourcesec.org |
Monday, November 1, 2010
CORRECTION: NCIL Legislative Priority Survey: 112th United States Congress (2011-2013)
NCIL Legislative Priority Survey: 112th United States Congress (2011-2013)
Take the survey: http://www.ncil.org/news/2011legislativesurvey.html.
Soon a new year will be upon us and with it a new United States Congress. The new 112th Congress (2011-2013) brings with it new and renewed opportunities to advance and expand the Independent Living Movement, including restoration of our civil rights and reduction of employment disincentives through SSI. Though NCIL will always advocate for increased funding and awareness for the Independent Living Community, these advocacy efforts require a great amount of time, money, and resources. In order to focus our resources on the areas of greatest need to our members and the Independent Living Community, we have developed the NCIL Legislative Priorities Survey.
This survey consists of three sections; the first section is for demographic data collection and will be used to determine differences in needs for members within different regions of the United States. The second and third sections ask you to provide feedback as to which legislative areas have the greatest need for NCIL's attention and advocacy efforts. Please take the time to fill out the NCIL 2011-2013 Legislative Survey and help guide our efforts over the next US congressional session.
Thank You,
Dan Kessler, President
National Council on Independent Living
Deadline: November 12, 2010
If you would prefer a hard copy of this survey or have questions, please contact Austin Walker (austin@ncil.org) or Lacy Pittman (lacy@ncil.org) or call 202-207-0334. A text-only survey is attached to this email.
NCIL: Celebrating 25 Years of Independent Living
NCIL Legislative Priority Survey: 112th United States Congress (2011-2013)
Soon a new year will be upon us and with it a new United States Congress. The new 112th Congress (2011-2013) brings with it new and renewed opportunities to advance and expand the Independent Living Movement, including restoration of our civil rights and reduction of employment disincentives through SSI. Though NCIL will always advocate for increased funding and awareness for the Independent Living Community, these advocacy efforts require a great amount of time, money, and resources. In order to focus our resources on the areas of greatest need to our members and the Independent Living Community, we have developed the NCIL Legislative Priorities Survey.
This survey consists of three sections; the first section is for demographic data collection and will be used to determine differences in needs for members within different regions of the United States. The second and third sections ask you to provide feedback as to which legislative areas have the greatest need for NCIL's attention and advocacy efforts. Please take the time to fill out the NCIL 2011-2013 Legislative Survey and help guide our efforts over the next US congressional session.
Thank You,
Dan Kessler, President
National Council on Independent Living
If you have questions regarding this survey, please contact Austin Walker (austin@ncil.org) or Lacy Pittman (lacy@ncil.org) or call 202-207-0334.
Instructions: Please place an "x" next to your responses to each question. Please ensure that the response you intended is apparent, this will help make sure we count all of your selections. After you have completed the survey please send it to:
NCIL
Attn: Austin Walker
1710 Rhode Island Ave, Fifth Floor
Washington, D.C. 20036
Email: austin@ncil.org
Fax: 202-207-0341
SECTION I: Demographics
Name of individual NCIL member or member organization (Optional):
Respondent Type (Choose Only One):
-SILC
-CIL
-Individual
-Other Agency / Organization (Please Specify):
What is the state you reside (individuals) in or serve (organizations)?
What type of population do you reside in or serve (Select All That Apply)?
-Rural
-Suburban
-Metropolitan
SECTION II: Priorities for 2011-2013 Legislative Session
For each of the following topics please mark each as a being high, moderate, or low priority to indicate the amount of attention NCIL should spend on the topic in the upcoming 112th Congress 2011-2013. If you believe the topic should not be a focus of NCIL's upcoming activities then please mark NO Priority. Please provide a response to all topics presented. If you have further comments or need to elaborate on a topic please refer to SECTION III.
If you are uncertain about a topic, please round up to the higher priority of the ones you were considering. For example, if you are deciding between marking moderate versus low priority for any topic, then mark moderate.
1. Rehabilitation Act (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
1a. Reauthorization of Rehabilitation Act
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
1b. Adoption and Funding of 5th core service (Deinstitutionalization)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
1c. Creation of an Independent Living Administration to oversee the independent living program rather than RSA
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
1d. Adoption of Standards and Indicators for SILCs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2. Civil Rights / Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2a. ADA Enforcement
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2b. Violence and Abuse
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2c. Mental Health Advocacy
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2d. Judicial Nominations
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2e. Social Discrimination
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2f. Access to Public Accommodations
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2g. Voting Accessibility, Voter Identification Issues
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2h. Healthcare Clinic / Hospital Disability Access (Physical)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2i. General Accessibility Issues
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
2j. MCS/ES Civil Rights Issues
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
3. Social Security (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
3a. Improve SSA Employment Incentives plus increased Real Time Access
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
3b. SSA Reform and Improvement
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4. Employment (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4a. Eliminate Disincentives to Employment across federal and state agencies
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4b. Employer Education Regarding Individuals with Disabilities
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4c. Increased Employment Opportunities
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4d. Increase and Expand Vocational Training
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4e. Tax Incentives for Employment of Individuals with Disabilities
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4f. Employment Discrimination
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
4g. Phase out use of 14 (c) Subminimum Wage Certificates
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5. Healthcare (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5a. Access to Healthcare
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5b. Healthcare Provider Disability Education
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5c. Reduction of Healthcare Costs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5d. Reduction of Pharmaceutical Costs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5e. Mental Health Services
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5f. Affordable and Adequate Health Insurance
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5g. Universal Healthcare
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5h. Increased Community Based Healthcare
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5i. Wellness Programs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5j. Medicaid Reform
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5k. Medicare Reform
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5l. Adequate, Affordable, and Accessible Long-Term Care
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5m. Reproductive Rights
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5n. Electronic Health Records
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5o. Access to Durable Medical Equipment
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5p. Informed Consent
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5q. Insurance Coverage for Durable Medical Equipment
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
5r. Competitive Bidding for DMEPOS
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6. Personal Assistive Services (PAS) (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6a. Funding for PAS
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6b. Increase and Expand PAS Waivers
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6c. Access to PAS Programs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6d. Increased Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Capacity
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6e. Increase Number of Trained/Qualified Home Health Aides
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6f. Personal Care Assistants (PCA) Wages and Benefits
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6g. Medicaid / Medicare Reimbursement for PAS
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6h. Transition Funding for Relocation
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6i. Continuation and Expansion of Community Choice Act (CCA)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
6j. Support for PCA Unionization
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
7. Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
7a. Collaboration with the Aging Community
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8. Housing (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8a. Improvements to Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8b. Promoting Accessible Design, including Visitability, Universal Design & Healthy Buildings
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8c. More Section 8 Vouchers from HUD and maintain work incentives
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8d. Homeownership (Buying & Foreclosure Prevention)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8e. Fair Housing
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8f. Increase Integrated Housing
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
8g. Section 811 Regulations and Implementations
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
9. Emergency Preparedness (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
9a. Accessible Emergency Shelters and Services
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
9b. Accessible Temporary Housing
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
9c. Creation of a FEMA Disability Coordinator
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
9d. Emergency Preparedness Planning and Response by SILCs/CILs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
9e. Accessible Emergency Alerting System
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
10. Education (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
10a. IDEA Education
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
10b. Access to Higher Education
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
10c. Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
10d. Restraint and Seclusion
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
10e. Youth Transition Programs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
11. Technology (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
11a. Increased knowledge of the range (and scope) of assistive technology
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
11b. Ability to "see" and "try" assistive technology
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
11c. Access to information about funding of assistive technology
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
11d. Access to low-interest loans for assistive technology
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
11e. Access to assistive technology recycling/reuse programs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
11f. Increase payment of assistive technology equipment by third party payers (private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, waivers)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
12. International Civil Rights Development (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
12a. US Ratification of CRPD (UN Convention on the Right of Persons with Disabilities)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
12b. Implementation of CRPD
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
12c. Inclusion of People with Disabilities through Economic Development Activities
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
13. Transportation (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
13a. Funding of Public Transportation
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
13b. Affordable and Accessible Transportation
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
13c. Increased Para-Transit Services
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
13d. Accessible Taxis
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
13e. Accessible High Speed Rail
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
14. Veterans (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
14a. Funding for Veteran Outreach/Education on Resources/Benefits
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
14b. Increased IL services for Veterans by CILs
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
14c. Increase NCIL's capability to influence VA policy and funding to CILs for Veteran Services
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
15. Diversity Issues (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
16. IL Services for Native Americans / Alaskan Indians (Overall)
-High Priority
-Moderate Priority
-Low Priority
-No Priority
17. Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender (GLBT) Issues (Overall)
SECTION III: Additional Priorities
Using the Space below, please list any other items / areas you believe need moderate or strong emphasis by NCIL. You may also use the space to elaborate on any of the topics presented previously.
Lastly, please provide any comments you may have about the current survey.
Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey!
Please post and forward. Thanks. Cathy
--- On Fri, 10/29/10, NCIL <ncil@ncil.org> wrote:
NCIL Legislative Priority Survey: 112th United States Congress (2011-2013)
Take the survey: http://www.ncil.org/news/2011legislativesurvey.html.
Soon a new year will be upon us and with it a new United States Congress. The new 112th Congress (2011-2013) brings with it new and renewed opportunities to advance and expand the Independent Living Movement, including restoration of our civil rights and reduction of employment disincentives through SSI. Though NCIL will always advocate for increased funding and awareness for the Independent Living Community, these advocacy efforts require a great amount of time, money, and resources. In order to focus our resources on the areas of greatest need to our members and the Independent Living Community, we have developed the NCIL Legislative Priorities Survey.
This survey consists of three sections; the first section is for demographic data collection and will be used to determine differences in needs for members within different regions of the United States . The second and third sections ask you to provide feedback as to which legislative areas have the greatest need for NCIL's attention and advocacy efforts. Please take the time to fill out the NCIL 2011-2013 Legislative Survey and help guide our efforts over the next US congressional session.
Thank You,
Dan Kessler, President
National Council on Independent Living
Deadline: November 12, 2010
If you would prefer a hard copy of this survey or have questions, please contact Austin Walker (austin@ncil.org) or Lacy Pittman (lacy@ncil.org) or call 202-207-0334. A text-only survey is attached to this email.
Do the People Running for Congress Support Eliminating the Institutional Bias?
Do the People Running for Congress Support Eliminating the Institutional Bias?New Tool Helps You Find Out!Source: ADAPT / Coalition for Community IntegrationADAPT has contacted the people running for Congress and asked them to indicate whether they would support eliminating the institutional bias in Medicaid by becoming a co-sponsor of and voting for the Community Choice Act during the next session of Congress if they are elected. We have compiled the results so far and posted them on the Coalition for Community Integration's website.
You can search the list by state and whether the candidates are running for the Senate or the House of Representatives. This website not only tells you where the candidates stand on the issue, but provides an email address so you can contact the candidates yourself.
We have a great opportunity to make a difference in the next Congress. The election is right around the corner and these candidates need your vote!
If the candidates for Congress in your state or district haven't signed the pledge and agreed to support CCA, tell them that THEIR PLEDGE TO VOTE for the Community Choice Act GETS YOUR VOTE! Urge them to sign the pledge to FREE OUR PEOPLE! Let them know that this is an important issue for people with disabilities, our families, and the people who support our issues.
You can also point out that this issue pretty much affects every American family at some point, and (according to a Harris poll) 89 percent of Americans would be willing to pay for Community Choice.
When you send your email, you can also send a link to the Pledge form: www.c4ci.org/Pledge.pdf.
It's important that they hear from their constituents so go to the website, check on your candidates and contact them today! After you check out the site, be sure to forward this email to other folks and ask them to do this too.
Let's make sure the people running for Congress know that we want them to FREE OUR PEOPLE!
Not sure what to say in an email? We've included the email that ADAPT sent the candidates below.
ADAPT Email to Candidates:
Eliminating the institutional bias in Medicaid and long term care by passing the Community Choice Act (HR1670/S683) has become one of the most important national goals for the disability community. But even though this legislation has been championed by the disability community, there is widespread support for it.
In April 2010, a Harris Interactive survey found that 66% of respondents said they support the Community Choice Act without even knowing the cost. When the cost was broken down into the amount paid by middle class taxpayers (just over a $6 per year increase in federal taxes), the percentage of people supporting the legislation skyrocketed. Once people were told how much it cost, the survey found that 89 percent of Americans were willing to pay for this legislation.
Of course, there was even more support for this legislation among retired Americans. A whopping 94% of retired Americans stated that they would support this legislation. These findings corroborate research by AARP which found that 89% of Americans age 50 and over prefer to remain in their homes as long as they can (AARP Public Policy Institute, 2009).
You may be wondering is it is really possible for 89% of Americans to support anything, but when you take a closer look at the Community Choice Act, you realize that it appeals to people for a lot of different reasons.
· Of course, as retired Americans face the future, they want to stay in their own homes, and the Community Choice Act would give them that option.
· Americans committed to family values want to stay together, rather than institutionalize a child, spouse, or parent, and the Community Choice Act would give them that option.
· Americans committed to civil rights support this legislation because it creates a mechanism that allows people with disabilities to live in the most integrated setting as promised in the Supreme Court's Olmstead decision.
And these Americans want to know what YOUR position is on this important issue.
The Coalition for Community Integration has partnered with ADAPT to gather information about Congressional candidates and whether they will support the Community Choice Act in the 112th Congress.
I am writing to ask that the campaign for Todd Kolosso who is running for the WI, U.S. House 5 complete a pledge form and return it right away.
To make this easy, you can respond in several different ways.
1. You can reply to this email, indicating the candidate's position on the Community Choice Act. If you are replying from the address we sent this email to, you won't even need to sign the form;
2. You can print out this email, fill out the Pledge section at the bottom of it and fax it back to us; or
3. You can print out a PDF of our pledge form (www.c4ci.org/Pledge.pdf) and fax it to us at 585-546-5643.
Please respond soon so we can include your information with the information we are posting to our website and the update we will be distributing nationally.
Not sure where you stand on this issue, to get more information on the Community Choice Act, you can go the ADAPT webpage: www.adapt.org/cca.php.
__,_._,___